Highest Prescribers Of Cancer Drug Paid As Speakers

Print More

Eight of the top 10 prescribers of a potent narcotic used for cancer pain were paid more than $870,000 in speaking fees by the drug maker in 2013 and 2014 — indicating that Derby nurse Heather Alfonso was not the only high prescriber compensated by the company.

Alfonso, an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) who worked at the Comprehensive Pain and Headache Treatment Center in Derby, pleaded guilty last month to accepting $83,000 in kickbacks from 2013 to March 2015 from the drug company Insys Therapeutics, which has heavily marketed a painkiller called Subsys, a sublingual fentanyl spray approved only for cancer patients. Alfonso was paid to speak about Subsys at more than 70 “dinner programs,” but most of those programs were attended only by her and a sales representative for Insys, or by Alfonso’s colleagues and friends who had no authority to prescribe the drug, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Connecticut.

insys.chart3PMwebAlfonso faces a maximum prison term of five years and a fine of up to $250,000 on the charge of receiving kickbacks in connection with a federal healthcare program. In pleading guilty, she admitted that the money she was paid influenced her prescribing of Subsys, often to non-cancer patients, federal investigators said.

A review of federal Medicare prescribing data and drug company payment records shows that at least eight of the 10 highest prescribers of Subsys in the Medicare program in 2013 were also paid by Insys for speaking engagements in 2013 and 2014. All of the eight except Alfonso are physicians. The two prescribers in the top 10 who do not show up as receiving Insys payments are not included in the federal Open Payments database because they are physician assistants.

Dr. Bart Gatz of Boynton Beach, Florida, was the highest paid by Insys, receiving $154,000 from the company in 2013 and 2014, most of it in speaking fees. The other seven providers each received between $67,000 and $144,000.

Alfonso is the only paid speaker for Insys who has been charged with taking kickbacks, and there is no evidence that other speakers did the same. The company confirmed in December 2013 that it was under federal investigation related to its sales and marketing of Subsys, and said it was cooperating in the probe.

Insys representatives did not return messages seeking comment. The company has previously denied any wrongdoing in its marketing of Subsys.

Federal investigators said that Alfonso was paid by Insys as a speaker at a rate of about $1,000 per event. Drug company payment disclosures show that other Insys speakers earned $3,000 or more for each speaking engagement.

Dr. Jerrold Rosenberg of Providence, Rhode Island, was paid more than $110,000 as an Insys speaker in 2013 and 2014, with per-event payments rising from $1,600 in early 2014, to $2,200 and $3,700 later in the year. In some months, he was paid for speaking engagements every week.

Gatz, of Florida, received speaking fees ranging from $1,500 to $4,700 that grew in frequency throughout 2014. In October, he received 10 payments totaling more than $30,000, indicating that he was speaking two or three times every week.

Gatz and Rosenberg could not be reached for comment. Rosenberg was reprimanded last September by the Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline for prescribing Subsys to patients “off-label” for reasons other than cancer pain, without properly documenting the reasons.

Drug companies have paid physicians as speakers for decades, and there is nothing illegal about a doctor who prescribes a certain drug accepting money from a company to speak about that drug. The arrangement becomes a kickback when the physician’s prescribing is directly influenced or rewarded by the payments.

“You’re always going to have the chicken-and-egg problem” in such speaker arrangements, said Dr. Joseph Ross, an associate professor of medicine at Yale School of Medicine, who has written about the industry’s influence on physicians. “Is the company approaching doctors because they prescribe the drug, or are the doctors prescribing the drugs” they speak about?

Ross believes that physicians who give talks about medications to their peers should not be compensated by the companies that make those drugs.

“When you’re talking about educational programs for physicians, you want an objective, measured assessment,” he said. “There are plenty of doctors who give talks like this, based on the evidence, who have no conflicts. They’re called ‘conflict-free’ speakers.”

Ross said he was surprised by the case involving Alfonso – not so much because she admitted accepting kickbacks, but because her high prescribing of Schedule II narcotics, including the fentanyl in Subsys, went unnoticed for so long. A February story by C-HIT had raised questions about Alfonso’s standing as one of the top 10 Medicare prescribers — nationally — of Schedule II drugs in 2012.

“It’s pretty shocking to me that someone – a nurse in Derby, Connecticut – could be accountable for so many prescriptions,” Ross said.

The top prescriber of Subsys in the Medicare program was Dr. Gavin Awerbuch of Michigan, who billed Medicare for $7 million for the drug from 2009 to February 2014— writing more than six times the number of prescriptions than the next higher prescriber. He was arrested in May 2014 on charges of health care fraud and illegal distribution of controlled substances. The criminal complaint against him charges that he prescribed Subsys “outside the scope of legitimate medical practice and for no legitimate medical purpose.” He also was charged with billing Medicare for tests he didn’t conduct.

Awerbuch was paid about $90,000 by Insys in 2013 and 2014, most of it for speaking engagements.

Two other top prescribers of Subsys – Drs. Xiulu Ruan and John Couch of Mobile, Alabama, who own a pain specialty practice — were indicted in April 2015 for prescribing controlled substances, such as Oxycodone and morphine, outside the usual scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose, and conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud. The indictment does not mention Subsys.

Ruan and Couch were paid close to $220,000 by Insys in 2013 and 2014.

Nationally, Insys paid out about $10 million to more than 3,000 physicians in 2013 and 2014, most of it for speaking engagements. In 2013, Medicare paid $30 million for 5,072 prescriptions for Subsys.

A complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Texas in 2012 by a former salesman for Insys, Ray Furchak, alleged that the company used its speaker program to “induce” or “reward” prescription writing by doctors. The Department of Justice opted not to join Furchak’s suit and he withdrew it in 2013.

In Connecticut, Alfonso was the highest Subsys prescriber by far, writing out more than $1 million in Subsys prescriptions in the two years between January 2013 and March 2015, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office. In 2013, she wrote out 69 prescriptions for Subsys to Medicare patients, at a cost of $239,000, federal records show.

Subsys is an expensive, highly addictive drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012 for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain. So far, at least 63 people have died of complications from the drug, according to an analysis of FDA adverse event reports commissioned by the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation.


One thought on “Highest Prescribers Of Cancer Drug Paid As Speakers

  1. I mean now i knw pain clinics, at least in Pitt, Pa u need a referral but that’s easy to get from your primary care. But let me get 1 thing across here is that i’m not defending any of these or other doctors taking “kickbacks” instead of getting paid by major drug Pharma’s legitimately. Now when it comes to off label use like how they say in this form of fentanyl and basically all the forms say for cancer pain only. Or other potent NARCOTICS in their literature say for cancer pain only, not only are Dr.s allowed to rx those drugs off-label for other really bad forms of chronic pain like r.s.d which i have and other really bad chronic neuropathies, or people that have freakn titanium rods in their body and so on if the prescribing Dr. and it can even be your pcp that rx’s to you AS LONG AS YOU THE PATIENT HAS A GOOD DOCUMENTATION TRAIL OF YOUR DISEASE OR WHAT NOT the Dr’s cannot get in trouble. Now when the dea comes by well now as of 2017 they have these specific “Task Forces” going to pain clinics and pcp offices looking for a reason why lets say “BILL” has been getting prescribed this narcotic or whatever narcotic and all these Dr.s just better have the correct codes in the patients profile as long as the paper trail of what he needs this level of care with the use of any opiate or opioid painkiller…look i don’t knw where i’m taking this but being involved with pain management since 2011 and how not only now but before this new wave of overprescribing pain meds to patients who actually fit all the criteria like how i do that these new DEA Task Forces require dr.s are still scared and severely under dosing and underprescribing meds for we the unfortunate chronic pain patients whose pain will never go away like my REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY i have now seen and heard of horror stories of people taking their own damn lives and turning to either buying pills or even now getting heroin bc all these Dr.s are pulling way back in the amount and dose these people used to get. So now what i see out of all of this under rx’n and NOT PRESCRIBING meds “we” meaning everyone and me with chronic, around the clock 24 hrs a day 365 days a year in pain at least with my disease that has no cure and can only to treat the symptoms, will never have a decent ill even take half decent quality of life. NOW JUST WATCH ON THE NEWS OR HOWEVER U KEEP UP WITH CURRENT EVENTS, YOU WILL NOW SEE A STEADY RISE OF NEW HEROIN ADDICTED PEOPLE AND THE UNFURNIATE TAKING OF PEOPLES LIVES CAUSE THEY COULDN’T BEAR THE PAIN ANYMORE ANS IVE BEEN THERE ALMOST A COUPLE TIMES. So i will go on taking just lyrica and gabapentin for now until something else FUCKING CHANGES. SORRY for that outburst but making more addicts and more suicides is all that is happening alot bc of this OPIATE,OPIOID EPIDEMIC . MORE HARM WELL WAY MORE HARM ITS DOING THEN GOOD. THANKS